In today's digital product landscape, design systems have become the industry standard, used by major players like Amazon, Google, Airbnb, and Uber. Despite their widespread adoption, design teams often face the challenge of proving their value to management. A design system isn't just a technical solution—it's a strategic business tool, and the key to its acceptance lies in precisely measuring return on investment (ROI).

What is a Design System and Why Does It Matter?

A design system is "a collection of reusable components, guided by clear standards, that can be assembled to build any number of applications." It goes beyond simple style guides or component libraries, encompassing guidelines for interactions, branding, content, and engineering, serving as a "single source of truth" for the entire organization.

Key Business Benefits

• Faster time-to-market: Accelerate product launches by 30–50%

• Improved visual consistency: Build customer trust and increase conversion rates

• Reduced technical debt: Lower maintenance costs significantly

• Regulatory compliance: Ensure adherence to regulations like the European Accessibility Act (EAA) and WCAG guidelines

Why Measuring ROI is Challenging

Management often perceives design systems as abstract investments whose value isn't immediately visible. The initial workload can seem enormous compared to smaller, more tangible features that deliver value "here and now" but generate technical debt. Implementation also brings challenges such as integration with existing processes and lack of stakeholder understanding of the tool's value.

The ROI Formula: "One Formula to Rule Them All"

To facilitate communication with business stakeholders, mathematical models have been developed to estimate ROI. One of the most comprehensive models is based on analyzing costs and benefits over time.

Key Model Assumptions

This model adopts several conservative assumptions:

1. Lifecycle: The design system remains "good" for 5 years (60 months), after which a major update occurs (e.g., rebranding)

2. Ramp-up phase: If the team invests 20% of their time, the build phase takes approximately 12 months, with a minimum implementation time of 6 months

3. Efficiency curve: Initially, productivity drops due to the initial investment. Benefits appear gradually: 0% in the first half of the ramp-up phase, 50% in the second half, and 100% after full implementation

Formula Parameters

Three variables are needed for calculations:

• X: Percentage of time dedicated to building the system

• Y: Percentage of time dedicated to ongoing maintenance after the ramp-up phase

• Z: Expected productivity increase from the system

Industry research (Nielsen Norman Group, Forrester) and data from companies like Figma suggest that design team productivity increases by an average of 34–38%, while development teams see gains of 30–31%.

Practical Example: Acme, Inc.

Consider a company with 5 designers and 10 developers. Assume they invest 30% of time (X=30) at startup and 10% (Y=10) on maintenance.

For the Design Team (Z=38):

• Costs: Over 5 years, work on the system effectively consumes 7.6 months of the entire team's work

• Benefits: The system saves 20.52 months of work

• ROI: 170%, meaning every dollar invested returns $2.70

For the Development Team (Z=31):

• Costs: Same as designers—7.6 months

• Benefits: Saves 16.74 months of work

• ROI: 120%

Total Result: Combined net benefits for such an organization can amount to hundreds of thousands of dollars over 5 years.

Financial Impact Beyond Team Hours

Design system ROI extends far beyond time savings:

1. Reduced maintenance costs: Typically drop from 20–40% to 10–20% of team time, freeing resources for innovation

2. Faster onboarding: New team members become productive more quickly thanks to ready-made patterns

3. Competitive advantage: Reusable components enable feature releases weeks ahead of competitors. For example, REA Group saved 300,000 work hours over four years with their system

Key Performance Indicators

To effectively report success, track specific metrics:

Quantitative Metrics:

• Team velocity: Time to build new screens before and after implementation (goal: 30–50% reduction)

• Adoption rate: Number of components used from the library compared to custom components (goal: above 70% reusability)

• Quality: Reduction in interface bugs by 40–60%

• Consistency: Visual consistency audit results (e.g., Shopify achieved 95% consistency)

Qualitative Metrics:

• Team satisfaction and improved collaboration

• Increased stakeholder trust through predictable timelines

• 20–30% reduction in support tickets due to more intuitive interfaces

Leveraging Tools and Analytics

Modern tools like Figma Library Analytics enable precise tracking of component, style, and variable usage.

A particularly important metric is the component detachment rate. A high rate can signal three things:

1. A bug in the component

2. Need for new functionality that the system doesn't anticipate

3. Unusual element combinations by users

Monitoring this data enables continuous improvement of the system as a "living organism."

Design Systems and Accessibility (WCAG and EAA)

Implementing a design system is a strategic step toward compliance with the European Accessibility Act (EAA). The EAA mandates digital product accessibility not only for people with disabilities but also for seniors and those with temporary limitations.

Design systems facilitate this through:

• Standardization and testing of components for WCAG compliance (e.g., contrast, keyboard operability)

• Easier compliance maintenance across multiple platforms simultaneously

• Success stories like the BBC and their GEL system, which enabled mass-scale accessibility requirements while maintaining consistency

How to Start Measuring and Implementing

Success depends on a systematic approach:

1. Audit: Identify inconsistencies and areas requiring improvement in current products

2. Establish business goals: Is the priority time-to-market or bug reduction?

3. Education: Workshops for IT, marketing, and design departments to build awareness of the system's value

4. Historical approach: Analyze data from the past year to identify patterns that led to current results (learning model)

5. Gradual implementation: Start with key components affecting accessibility, allowing for quick value demonstration

Conclusion

Investing in a design system isn't just about aesthetics—it's the foundation of long-term efficiency and competitiveness. While initial costs may seem high, the benefits from time savings, quality improvements, and regulatory compliance (ROI in the range of 100–200%) make it clear that the question isn't whether you can afford a design system, but whether you can afford not to have one. Using hard data, such as time saved by REA Group or productivity increases at IBM, allows building arguments that management cannot ignore.

———————————————————————————

Additional Resources

Want to dive deeper into design system ROI? Here are the key articles and resources that informed this post:

Smashing Magazine

One Formula To Rule Them All: The ROI Of A Design System

By Maximilian Speicher & Guido Baena Wehrmann

Read Article →

💼 Variantly Blog

The Real ROI of Design Systems: Value for Designers, Developers, and Product Teams

Read Article →

🧮 DesignSystems.one

Design System ROI Calculator

Interactive tool to calculate the business value of your design system

Try Calculator →

🎨 Figma

Design systems 101: How to measure design system ROI

Official guide from Figma on measuring design system impact

Read Guide →